Divorce Documents Required for Khula:
To know the divorce documents required in the khula in Pakistan law, you may contact Jamila Law Associates. The record revealed that her husband beat the wife, and due to said beating wife was severely injured, and it ruptured her eardrum. The beating had been established from the evidence produced by the wife on thedivorce documents required in the khula in Pakistan law as she had appeared and narrated the facts as alleged in her plaint, mostly about the behavior of her husband and other housemates.
injury allegation:
The record further showed that she was not confronted in Court regarding her physical beating and injury allegation. The witnesses produced by her had also stated about physical torture. Evidence in the circumstances established that the wife was subjected to physical torture, her eardrum was ruptured, and she remained under treatment. Trial Court, while giving findings, read the evidence in that regard, and Appellate Court had also Overlooked said aspect of the divorce documents required in the khula in Pakistan law.
High Court:
High Court set aside findings on the relevant issue and decided the same in affirmative and observed that both the courts below had rightly decided the question of custody of minors in favor of mother as the mother of Husband was an old lady who herself needed extra care so she could not take care of two minor children. A prime consideration in such cases was the welfare of minors. During the subsistence of the marriage, the husband had contracted second marriage and did not think about the future of his minor children. Father was allowed to meet the minor once a month. Family Court/ Executing Court was directed that on application for the divorce documents required in the khula in Pakistan law by father custody of both minors could be granted on both the Eids.
Khula in Pakistan:
The constitutional petition on the divorce documents required in the khula in Pakistan law was disposed of accordingly. had ignored rather non- Petitioner/mother contended that the respondent/father was not entitled to visitation rights allowed by the two Courts below. Respondent contended that though the Trial Court had declined his guardianship application, he, being his father, was at least entitled to periodical visitations. Respondent was the birth father of minors, and his visitation rights involved the rights of minors towards their father.
Channeling Activities:
Fatherly supervision, channeling their activities, would be beneficial for the welfare of the minors, which could not be denied for the divorce documents required in the khula in Pakistan law. Respondent, undisputedly, had been providing maintenance to the said minors. High Court observed that Petitioner, patently, had attempted to deprive the respondent (Father) of his love and affection with his children by filing a present petition seeking permanent detachment of the respondent/father from his children to satisfy her ego, which would also deprive the children of their rights towards their father.
Illegality or Infirmity:
it noticed no illegality or infirmity in the impugned orders passed by the two Courts below on the divorce documents required in the khula in Pakistan law. A constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly. The status of parents was a consequence of a legal contract, which continued even on the dissolution of the marriage between parents.
