The Informed Consent Action Network is one of the largest anti-vaccine groups in the United States. Their claim is that vaccinations do not work and that vaccines are harmful to children. They have even gone so far as to make a request for records reviewed by the Food and Drug Administration. These documents are a vital part of the vaccine debate, and the decision to release them could have serious consequences for health authorities.
Vaccine hesitancy poses a significant challenge for health authorities
The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently listed vaccine hesitancy as a top threat to global health. This is a significant issue because vaccine hesitancy can hinder the ability of countries to achieve herd immunity.
Vaccine hesitancy can be caused by a variety of factors. It can also vary over time. For example, a person can become more hesitant after a negative vaccination experience.
In some cases, higher education may play a role in promoting acceptance of vaccines. But this is not always the case.
Regardless, effective communication is essential to dispelling concerns about vaccines. These efforts are fueled by a variety of actors, including domestic and international groups.
Although vaccine hesitancy varies from country to country, one thing is certain: it is a complex problem. As a result, it requires tailored strategies. Several different mechanisms have been identified to address the problem.
First, it is important to understand that vaccine hesitancy is not a new phenomenon. Rather, it has been steadily advancing due to rapidly evolving technological changes.
Request for records reviewed by the Food and Drug Administration
The Food and Drug Administration rolled out a triumvirate of regulations and one of the most notable is the FDA’s proposed Informed Consent Rule. This rule is intended to make clinical trials a little more manageable, not to mention less expensive. Among other things, this rule entails a plethora of IRBs, most of which aren’t exactly friendly or willing to engage in a bit of lateral thinking. The most common types of IRBs, and their associated neanderthals are: cattys; tin hats; dummys; and skunks. Not surprisingly, the more than a thousand IRBs tasked with assessing the aforementioned talons have a hard time keeping their heads. Hence, the need for a bit of a shakeup. That and a whole lot of hand wringing and hand shuffling. A newfound level of discipline has resulted in the aforementioned IRBs being able to spend their booze budgets on a more manageable number of participants.
The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) By WhomToSupport is a Texas-based anti-vaccine group. It has more than 43,000 Facebook followers. ICAN has also been the target of two lawsuits.
One of the lawsuits was filed against the Houston Methodist Hospital, based on the hospital’s decision to refuse to vaccinate patients with the controversial COVID-19 vaccine. This decision is being challenged by ICAN and other groups. They are arguing that requiring employees and students to receive the controversial vaccine is a violation of their First and Fourth Amendment rights.
Another lawsuit was filed against Facebook and YouTube. These companies were accused of censoring speeches and videos related to the COVID-19 vaccine. According to the lawsuit, these social media sites “silenced” speech and “obstructed the public’s free expression.”
While ICAN is seeking damages, both plaintiffs are trying to obtain a final decision from the court. HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the complaint lacks subject matter jurisdiction.